Mediation Analysis Without Sequential Ignorability: Using Baseline Covariates Interacted with Random Assignment as Instrumental Variables
نویسنده
چکیده
In randomized trials, researchers are often interested in mediation analysis to understand how a treatment works, in particular how much of a treatment’s effect is mediated by an intermediated variable and how much the treatment directly affects the outcome not through the mediator. The standard regression approach to mediation analysis assumes sequential ignorability of the mediator, that is that the mediator is effectively randomly assigned given baseline covariates and the randomized treatment. Since the experiment does not randomize the mediator, sequential ignorability is often not plausible. Ten Have et al. (2007, Biometrics), Dunn and Bentall (2007, Statistics in Medicine) and Albert (2008, Statistics in Medicine) presented methods that use baseline covariates interacted with random assignment as instrumental variables, and do not require sequential ignorability. We make two contributions to this approach. First, in previous work on the instrumental variable approach, it has been assumed that the direct effect of treatment and the effect of the mediator are constant across subjects; we allow for variation in effects across subjects and show what assumptions are needed to obtain consistent estimates for this setting. Second, we develop a method of sensitivity analysis for violations of the key assumption that the direct effect of the treatment and the effect of the mediator do not depend on the baseline covariates.
منابع مشابه
Mediation analysis with principal stratification.
In assessing the mechanism of treatment efficacy in randomized clinical trials, investigators often perform mediation analyses by analyzing if the significant intent-to-treat treatment effect on outcome occurs through or around a third intermediate or mediating variable: indirect and direct effects, respectively. Standard mediation analyses assume sequential ignorability, i.e. conditional on co...
متن کاملEvaluation of Imputation of Covariates in an Impact Analysis With Regression Adjustment
In an impact analysis using random assignment, researchers often deal with missing values in both the covariates and the outcome variables of regression models. Clearly rigorous methods are needed to impute missing values in the outcome variables to minimize the potential bias in impact assessments. When imputation is applied to covariates of the regression analyses, the effect of imputation is...
متن کاملMediation Analysis for Count and Zero-Inflated Count DataWithout Sequential Ignorability and Its Appli- cation in Dental Studies
متن کامل
A Formal Treatment of Sequential Ignorability
Taking a rigorous formal approach, we consider sequential decision problems involving observable variables, unobservable variables, and action variables. We can typically assume the property of extended stability, which allows identification (by means of "[Formula: see text]-computation") of the consequence of a specified treatment strategy if the "unobserved" variables are, in fact, observed-b...
متن کاملIdentification and Estimation of Causal Mediation Effects with Treatment Noncompliance∗
Treatment noncompliance, a common problem in program evaluation, poses a serious challenge to the identification of causal mechanisms via causal mediation analysis. This is because the mediated portion of an intention-to-treat (ITT) effect cannot be nonparametrically identified even when there is no unobserved confounding. In particular, the commonly-used naïve approach of ignoring the actual t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012